From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 31 15:14:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06E25106566B for ; Mon, 31 May 2010 15:14:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from decke@bluelife.at) Received: from mail.itac.at (unknown [IPv6:2002:5bc2:5ac8:d:20c:29ff:fe19:7b2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78C618FC13 for ; Mon, 31 May 2010 15:14:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [91.205.172.21] (helo=webmail.bluelife.at) by mail.itac.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OJ6gi-0007bS-Ho; Mon, 31 May 2010 17:14:00 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 17:14:01 +0200 From: Bernhard Froehlich To: Michael Butler In-Reply-To: <4C03B42B.2080206@protected-networks.net> References: <4C011524.7050806@FreeBSD.org> "<4C0259D8.2000902@freebsd.org>" <4C031860.6070802@freebsd.org> <20100531085555.GB55614@heechee.tobez.org> <4C03B42B.2080206@protected-networks.net> Message-ID: <5bae657843a7c00f05c14c2bed884364@bluelife.at> X-Sender: decke@bluelife.at User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.4-beta X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "mail.itac.at", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Mon, 31 May 2010 09:05:47 -0400, Michael Butler wrote: > On 05/31/10 04:55, Anton Berezin wrote: >> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 11:01:04AM +0900, Daichi GOTO wrote: >>> Memory leaks there I have noticed. Look at follow message of top(1): >> >> I also experience memory leaks. WinXP guest, amd64-CURRENT (from >> 2010-05-10) host. 100% CPU load when the guest is doing nothing, and >> memory >> usage keeps growing at a rather alarming pace. > > Just an observation - this appears to be related to using the additions > from 3.2.0. Using VBox 3.2.0 with the 3.1.8 additions doesn't appear to > display the leak - no idea what triggers this behaviour, [...] Content analysis details: (-0.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.4 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 1.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CFT: VirtualBox 3.2.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 15:14:02 -0000 On Mon, 31 May 2010 09:05:47 -0400, Michael Butler wrote: > On 05/31/10 04:55, Anton Berezin wrote: >> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 11:01:04AM +0900, Daichi GOTO wrote: >>> Memory leaks there I have noticed. Look at follow message of top(1): >> >> I also experience memory leaks. WinXP guest, amd64-CURRENT (from >> 2010-05-10) host. 100% CPU load when the guest is doing nothing, and >> memory >> usage keeps growing at a rather alarming pace. > > Just an observation - this appears to be related to using the additions > from 3.2.0. Using VBox 3.2.0 with the 3.1.8 additions doesn't appear to > display the leak - no idea what triggers this behaviour, I've just talked to the virtualbox developers and this is obviously an known bug in the 3.2.0 additions. As a workaround you can use the 3.1.8 additions and they said it will be fixed with 3.2.2. Thanks! -- Bernhard Fröhlich http://www.bluelife.at/