From owner-freebsd-mono@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 16 19:17:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mono@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 661C91065676 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 19:17:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rhyous@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD4AB8FC16 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 19:16:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf23 with SMTP id 23so1290223wyf.13 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:16:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=RJcIYQDBEjDuLXiGnYj0q2YNms5eSKNOhlAJAU5IgV8=; b=tPOBkV7L9rzorc7v+xzjJdK5bruV60d1mAy9M850bQaU38BfGgZwvsAt+20lUftBJu VakwnVo5KzSjAJdp1m+FsnydJann761lHEPB4jN0CUnumCtdbOnHHx/Pzv2kl+AgLFt3 miNgBLfTq3eK++RER/fPz9iVMqGQUFW7NkIlo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.85.161 with SMTP id i1mr37131639wiz.17.1321471018170; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:16:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.86.105 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:16:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20111116153640.GB80608@FreeBSD.org> References: <4EB58FD3.8090209@gmail.com> <4EBEC615.4080609@gmail.com> <20111116153640.GB80608@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:16:58 -0700 Message-ID: From: Jared Barneck To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Romain_Tarti=E8re?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: mono@freebsd.org, James Colannino Subject: Re: Building boo-0.9.4.9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-mono@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Mono and C# applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 19:17:01 -0000 2011/11/16 Romain Tarti=E8re > Hello > > On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 04:17:39PM -0700, Jared Barneck wrote: > > I don't remember why portshaker exists over using the standard ports an= d > > keeping the standard ports updated. > > Basically, the ports should be considered as stable (hahum...) and I > consider stuff in bsd-sharp as "early stage" and I don't mind breaking > everything in this repo. If you have patches I would be pleased to > apply them. I prefer patches against BSD# since it is supposed to be > more up-to-date but as a last ressort, a patch against the ports is > better than no patch at all. Ok, I understood you to mean this: Just like FreeBSD has Release, Stable, Current, the normal FreeBSD ports tree is considered release for all Mono ports on FreeBSD and everything in portshaker is considered stable/current. Did I understand correctly?