From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 30 15:40:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73B2216A469 for ; Wed, 30 May 2007 15:40:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aturetta@commit.it) Received: from mailbox.rainbownet.com (mailbox.logital.it [85.18.201.116]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCCD813C4BB for ; Wed, 30 May 2007 15:40:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aturetta@commit.it) Received: from 192.168.15.46 ([192.168.15.46]) (authenticated user aturetta@rainbownet.com) by rainbownet.com (mailbox.rainbownet.com [127.0.0.1]) (MDaemon.PRO.v6.8.5.R) with ESMTP id 29-md50000000120.tmp for ; Wed, 30 May 2007 17:29:28 +0200 Message-ID: <465D9856.1050600@commit.it> Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 17:29:26 +0200 From: Angelo Turetta User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-Sender: aturetta@rainbownet.com X-Spam-Processed: mailbox.rainbownet.com, Wed, 30 May 2007 17:29:28 +0200 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.15.46 X-Return-Path: aturetta@commit.it X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: portupgrade-devel: problem with -o ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 15:40:24 -0000 I updated to portupgrade-devel following the instructions about Xorg7.2. Yesterday I tried the following: # portupgrade -p -o www/gtkhtml38 gtkhtml3 ---> Upgrading 'gtkhtml3-3.14.1' to 'gtkhtml3-3.14.2' (www/gtkhtml3) ---> Building '/usr/ports/www/gtkhtml3' # portversion -v portupgrade\* portupgrade-devel-2.3.0_5 = up-to-date with port The same happened when I tried to switch ghostscript from -gnu to -gpl (even in that occasion, the -gnu port had a concurrent PORTREVISION bump). Is this a portupgrade-devel bug or my system's mis-behavior? Maybe it's happening because the implicit update takes precedence over the '-o' switch? Angelo Turetta