From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Feb 3 07:17:56 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id HAA13570 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 3 Feb 1995 07:17:56 -0800 Received: from sbstark.cs.sunysb.edu (sbstark.cs.sunysb.edu [130.245.1.47]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id HAA13563 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 1995 07:17:50 -0800 Received: from starkhome.UUCP (root@localhost) by sbstark.cs.sunysb.edu (8.6.9/8.6.9) with UUCP id KAA05799 for hackers@freebsd.org; Fri, 3 Feb 1995 10:14:54 -0500 Received: by starkhome.cs.sunysb.edu (8.6.9/1.34) id IAA02329; Fri, 3 Feb 1995 08:50:37 -0500 Date: Fri, 3 Feb 1995 08:50:37 -0500 From: starkhome!gene@sbstark.cs.sunysb.edu (Gene Stark) Message-Id: <199502031350.IAA02329@starkhome.cs.sunysb.edu> To: Joe Greco CC: hackers@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: Joe Greco's message of Thu, 2 Feb 1995 23:57:38 -0600 (CST) Subject: PPPD, 2.0R, lcp-echo Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >Is anybody out there using lcp-echo's with pppd under 2.0R? I've got a >situation where a questionable pair of modems is occasionally locking up, >apparently some sort of flow control problem, and I'd like to enable >"lcp-echo-request" and "lcp-echo-failures", but when I do, the system panics >almost instantly (probably during the first echo). > >The remote end is a terminal server known to support lcp-echo requests. > >Is anyone doing it? Or am I smoking bad weed again? :-) I tried this the other day, and ran into the same problem. Didn't get a chance to look into it. Have at it! - Gene Stark