From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Nov 5 12:25:15 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA05049 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 5 Nov 1997 12:25:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from dyson.iquest.net (dyson.iquest.net [198.70.144.127]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA05032 for ; Wed, 5 Nov 1997 12:25:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from toor@dyson.iquest.net) Received: (from root@localhost) by dyson.iquest.net (8.8.7/8.8.5) id PAA00512; Wed, 5 Nov 1997 15:23:38 -0500 (EST) From: "John S. Dyson" Message-Id: <199711052023.PAA00512@dyson.iquest.net> Subject: Re: >64MB In-Reply-To: <199711050917.EAA07537@trinity.mit.edu> from "Charles M. Hannum" at "Nov 5, 97 04:17:42 am" To: mycroft@mit.edu (Charles M. Hannum) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 1997 15:23:38 -0500 (EST) Cc: tony@dell.com, jamil@trojanhorse.ml.org, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: dyson@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Charles M. Hannum said: > > FWIW, the new boot code in NetBSD actually does use the extended BIOS > calls to find more memory (and also reads gzipped kernels). This is > handy on my development machine with 256MB. B-) > > (So, now you not only know it can be done, but you know where to find > an example...) > I don't do boot code (that is other's territory), but I have wondered why the "standard" extended BIOS calls weren't used in FreeBSD also. -- John dyson@freebsd.org jdyson@nc.com