From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 8 11:34:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0494106564A; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 11:34:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@passap.ru) Received: from forward14.mail.yandex.net (forward14.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:801::4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38CC58FC0A; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 11:34:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp12.mail.yandex.net (smtp12.mail.yandex.net [95.108.131.191]) by forward14.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id B2ABD19810E7; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 15:34:31 +0400 (MSK) Received: from smtp12.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp12.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 6C96A16A04AF; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 15:34:31 +0400 (MSK) Received: from 46.38.39.187.tel.ru (46.38.39.187.tel.ru [46.38.39.187]) by smtp12.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id YU1WwmnP-YU1WaoF6; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 15:34:30 +0400 Message-ID: <4F8177C6.2070401@passap.ru> Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 15:34:30 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111114 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Linimon References: <4F809513.9090600@passap.ru> <20120408012557.GB12126@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <20120408012557.GB12126@lonesome.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 13:34:49 +0000 Cc: Chris Rees , Scot Hetzel , Jason Helfman , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mail/imaptools: port removal at Monday April 9th X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 11:34:33 -0000 08.04.2012 05:25, Mark Linimon пишет: > portmgr's policy is to honor removal requests, no matter the circumstances. > If someone wants to fork the last free release and host it somewhere, I > would be less concerned in that case. Yes, It's just what I think: As the maintainer of the port I should remove it under the author's request. If someone create a fork then the port may be restored from attick. -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve