From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 19:52:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C43E616A47B; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:52:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from server.baldwin.cx (66-23-211-162.clients.speedfactory.net [66.23.211.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 754B213C442; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:52:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from zion.baldwin.cx (zion.baldwin.cx [192.168.0.7]) (authenticated bits=0) by server.baldwin.cx (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0AJqnx1087216; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:52:55 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) From: John Baldwin To: Sergey Zaharchenko Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:32:40 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <20070110120731.GA1515@shark.localdomain> <200701100910.13167.jhb@freebsd.org> <20070110155331.GA2762@shark.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20070110155331.GA2762@shark.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701101432.41201.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (server.baldwin.cx [192.168.0.1]); Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:52:55 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.3/2433/Wed Jan 10 13:28:34 2007 on server.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=4.2 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on server.baldwin.cx Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nve related LOR triggered by lots of small packets, and a hard hang X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:52:58 -0000 On Wednesday 10 January 2007 10:53, Sergey Zaharchenko wrote: > Hello John! > > Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 09:10:12AM -0500 you wrote: > [snip] > > Have you tried using nfe(4)? :) > > Now I have, and it works just fine, thanks (I somehow thought nfe was > specific to some platform). Why isn't it the default? Smaller range of > hardware supported? It's just newer. I think perhaps current@ should switch to nfe(4) rather than nve(4) by default. David, any objections to that? -- John Baldwin