Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 11:37:06 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: Ade Lovett <ade@supernews.net>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, portmgr@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.8-REL and pkg-comment Message-ID: <20030305193706.GB7407@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20030305163143.5e3ce9ff.Alexander@Leidinger.net> References: <BA8AC079.2C116%ade@supernews.net> <20030305163143.5e3ce9ff.Alexander@Leidinger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--XF85m9dhOBO43t/C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 04:31:43PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On Tue, 04 Mar 2003 20:43:37 -0600 > Ade Lovett <ade@supernews.net> wrote: >=20 > > I notice that there's still a relatively large number of ports that hav= e not > > been converted from pkg-comment to Makefile/COMMENT=3D > >=20 > > Is this simply due to lack of an appropriate (trivial) script, or are t= here > > quoting bogons out there? >=20 > This is because of lazy committers... most of ports@ ports seem to be > converted. The same applies to ports with maintainers not @FreeBSD.org. > As explained by portmgr@ to me: every other port will get changed while > the ports freeze is in effect. Hmm..I havent heard any plans from other portmgr people to do this. Who said this? One way or the other I'd like to see pkg-comment retired by 4.8-R. Kris --XF85m9dhOBO43t/C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+ZlHhWry0BWjoQKURAk9hAKCoJrLhYotjcrbwoAVJwFYG3CrSIQCcDV+2 h5S/6JjvUnnk/qRdqIqHY9o= =77cO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XF85m9dhOBO43t/C-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030305193706.GB7407>