From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Tue Aug 18 01:25:05 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC24E3A8E0F for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 01:25:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BVtWP5WZLz4Vy4 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 01:25:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id BD75D3A8E8C; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 01:25:05 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD3973A86DE for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 01:25:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BVtWP4Xvmz4WB7 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 01:25:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F36D9B59 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 01:25:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07I1P5Sj032298 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 01:25:05 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 07I1P5pI032297 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 01:25:05 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248692] multimedia/kodi: Update to 18.8 and take maintainership Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 01:25:05 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: buildisok X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: james@french.id.au X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 01:25:05 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248692 --- Comment #8 from James French --- (In reply to yzrh from comment #7) I am only putting my hand up for maintainership so that it's looked after in the interim. No-one seemed that keen on the 18.6 (later 18.7.X) bug discuss= ion to take it and it's been radio silence since 18.8 came out at the end of Ju= ly. If you're keen, then by all means I'm happy if you take it instead. I'm mos= tly just keen to see the port with a maintainer, whomever that is. Slightly longer term, I was going to touch base with Tobias to see what the plan was with kodi-devel after 19 is released. If it's going to keep tracki= ng the development branch then yeah, it makes sense to keep the two ports with= two maintainers (assuming the kodi-devel maintainer isn't running kodi). If not, then I was going to propose replacing this port with kodi-devel. Unfortunately that API version filename is done by the upstream code itself. It's something we could patch for and I suspect in all likelihood that it's fine to omit that version specific symlink from our ports entirely. That sa= id, that filename is what the upstream build scripts generate though so I'm reluctant to just tamper with it on the off chance it causes issues. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=