From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 30 10:57:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75D2E16A4CE; Thu, 30 Dec 2004 10:57:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 212.106.252.179.adsl.jazztel.es (212.106.252.179.adsl.jazztel.es [212.106.252.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9665243D58; Thu, 30 Dec 2004 10:57:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es) Received: from [192.168.254.16] (orion.redesjm.local [192.168.254.16]) iBUAvCLZ048594; Thu, 30 Dec 2004 11:57:12 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@redesjm.local) Message-ID: <41D3DF08.2000207@redesjm.local> Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 11:57:12 +0100 From: Jose M Rodriguez User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041227) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eivind Eklund References: <20041229222343.GA71433@dragon.nuxi.com> <41D3BA59.9060505@redesjm.local> <20041230104323.GA44922@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20041230104323.GA44922@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter (version: 1.1.0-3; AVE: 6.29.0.5; VDF: 6.29.0.31; host: antares.redesjm.local) cc: ports@FreeBSD.org cc: Jose M Rodriguez Subject: Re: Why do we have both ghostscript-gpl and ghostscript-gnu? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 10:57:15 -0000 Eivind Eklund wrote: >On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 09:20:41AM +0100, Jose M Rodriguez wrote: > > >>David O'Brien wrote: >> >> >> >>>What's the difference between ghostscript-gpl and ghostscript-gnu? A >>>diff of their Makefile's doesn't make it any clearer. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>Versions. >>It was after a change in licence from the originator. >> >> > >According to the pkg-descr, these should both be the same (the GNU GPL). > > > No. The originator licenses are different. go there for answers. >>-gnu must remain at 7.x and unmaintained. >>-gpl is the new 8.x source distribution. >> >> > >Please add this information to pkg-descr. > >In general, whenever somebody copy a port - MAKE SURE BOTH pkg-descr FILES >DESCRIBE THE DIFFERENCES. (This is a general plea - we've got maybe a hundred >duplicates, and they're annoying.) > >Eivind. > > Will work, time permiting, but the original repocopy/patch is not mine. -- josemi