From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 6 08:53:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3072116A420 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 08:53:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A91843D49 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 08:53:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A17A2086; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 09:53:39 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Tests: AWL,BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Learn: ham X-Spam-Score: -2.4/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on tim.des.no Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EACC2083; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 09:53:39 +0100 (CET) Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E5A5933C43; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 09:53:38 +0100 (CET) From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Peter Wemm References: <20060304141957.14716.qmail@web32705.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20060304152433.W61086@fledge.watson.org> <200603051930.25957.peter@wemm.org> Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 09:53:38 +0100 In-Reply-To: <200603051930.25957.peter@wemm.org> (Peter Wemm's message of "Sun, 5 Mar 2006 19:30:25 -0800") Message-ID: <863bhwvtrh.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Chris BeHanna , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Subversion? (Re: HEADS UP: Importing csup into base) X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 08:53:45 -0000 Peter Wemm writes: > I'm sure there are many other pros and cons, and I know there are > other alternatives besides svn (eg: svk, mercurial, etc etc). svk is not an alternative to svn, it's an svn client. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no