From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 17 07:02:51 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4EB4106566C for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 07:02:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonic2000gr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f225.google.com (mail-fx0-f225.google.com [209.85.220.225]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F0CA8FC14 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 07:02:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonic2000gr@gmail.com) Received: by fxm25 with SMTP id 25so88280fxm.43 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:02:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GL54OkLHyfYfr3ltcdwRk+MTkepPkKiROLH4tT2Yvr8=; b=GJ8Z4dfzBQO4IcbBf3beKFUzXc7vrV7p+piCGbjx0KoH8Wcny9SSZniq5ZJ98qykqJ 6XDfFDf3wumQaoxtjK91GPx8pPATOMAl3emAiw9pgXVq/Uqzls1Ix/FJYdwAQejq3PL2 4ZJok9e1WyDbkLNKYhn3h87FntsJL46T13E7Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=B30iLvBk/vC12Eaik0FJ1E/Ac7/ylra3epQbbk1i4RFt0GDAQACH3akLl6p9ymjpFj LcGeTdhjkEIPMzZAVUPsOODBG99omgi4opC74tB1En7ICYQDBDqIMlFQy2kJoDMb+ecd J9ojJA86oe2jk4W5acUQKy5zXgf1Ey7Gsl9nc= Received: by 10.204.72.129 with SMTP id m1mr9140072bkj.61.1245222169819; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:02:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from atomic.dyndns.org (athedsl-4488437.home.otenet.gr [94.71.72.253]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 2sm546677fks.33.2009.06.17.00.02.48 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:02:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A389517.6010906@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:02:47 +0300 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090414) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Whitehouse References: <4A37380F.8020505@gmail.com> <4A37F503.7070207@onetel.com> In-Reply-To: <4A37F503.7070207@onetel.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-7 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Announcing: FreeBSD Custom XFCE ISO (take II) - Openoffice packages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 07:02:51 -0000 Chris Whitehouse wrote: > > > I would vote for including openoffice, it takes much longer to compile > than to download, or maybe make the package and any dependencies that > are not already included available as a separate tarball. > I've implemented this neat idea, the tarball is here: http://freebsd.dev-urandom.com/iso/i386/xfce-desktop/openoffice.tar.gz Instructions: http://freebsd.dev-urandom.com/iso/i386/xfce-desktop/README.openoffice As a matter of fact, I noticed only the main openoffice package is needed - every other run dependency is already present in the XFCE iso. The few other packages in the tarball are build dependencies.