From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Jun 20 16:11:50 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA01106 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 20 Jun 1997 16:11:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lsd.relcom.eu.net (lsd.relcom.eu.net [193.124.23.23]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA01099 for ; Fri, 20 Jun 1997 16:11:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from ache@localhost) by lsd.relcom.eu.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) id DAA26880; Sat, 21 Jun 1997 03:11:30 +0400 (MSD) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 1997 03:11:29 +0400 (MSD) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= X-Sender: ache@lsd.relcom.eu.net To: John Polstra cc: marcs@znep.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Apache 1.1.3 and 1.2.0 problems under FBSD2.2.2 In-Reply-To: <199706202218.PAA15225@austin.polstra.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, 20 Jun 1997, John Polstra wrote: > In article , > Marc Slemko wrote: > > > > Grr. I thought this had been fixed in FreeBSD, but I guess not. > > The problem here is that the FILE structure uses only a short for > > _file, which means it can only handle 255 fds. > > Er ... that's a mighty strange "short" you've got there, if it can only > hold a number up to 255. Maybe you should upgrade to a 32-bit machine. :-) It more sounds like FD_SETSIZE limit. It is why I increase default FD_SETSIZE to 1024 in -current :-) -- Andrey A. Chernov http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/