From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Sep 23 17:26:19 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id AE94F37B422; Sat, 23 Sep 2000 17:26:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6])
	by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA17907;
	Sat, 23 Sep 2000 18:26:10 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id SAA08490; Sat, 23 Sep 2000 18:26:10 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <200009240026.SAA08490@harmony.village.org>
To: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@cup.hp.com>
Subject: Re: mtree again 
Cc: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru>, current@freebsd.org,
	marcel@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 23 Sep 2000 16:02:48 PDT."
		<39CD3698.D2EF0663@cup.hp.com> 
References: <39CD3698.D2EF0663@cup.hp.com>  <20000915033837.A564@nagual.pp.ru> <200009142341.RAA00700@harmony.village.org> <20000915043925.A83698@nagual.pp.ru> 
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 18:26:09 -0600
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In message <39CD3698.D2EF0663@cup.hp.com> Marcel Moolenaar writes:
: Is their any harm in just keeping the -P flag as a no-op and optionally
: remove it at some later time (for backward compatibility)?

-P is non-standard, was introduced only in July and therefore we don't 
need to keep it around for any reason at all.

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message