Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 23:24:13 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> To: Tod McQuillin <devin@spamcop.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Odd file in /lost+found after softupdate inconsistency in fsck Message-ID: <47CF0F7D.3050805@icyb.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <1204734183.00036125.1204722602@10.7.7.3> References: <1204734183.00036125.1204722602@10.7.7.3>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 05/03/2008 14:43 Tod McQuillin said the following: > Hi all, > > My server froze up tonight after a 2 month uptime running 6.3-PRERELEASE > from Dec 28 2007. > > I had to fsck /home by hand because of an inconsistency fsck couldn't > repair automatically -- something to do with an unexpected softupdate > inconsistency. > > After that, I ended up with some files in /home/lost+found, one of which > is quite interesting: > > /home/lost+found# ls -lksh > total 24432 > 24432 -r-------- 1 root operator 40G Mar 5 20:12 #0000005 > > It is 40G in size but only occupies 24432k on disk, so it is a sparse > file. I'm not aware of any sparse files of quite that size on my system > (or relative sparseness) but it's possible i might overlook one. > > But the thing that's interesting to me is the inode number (inode 5) and > the fact that rm doesn't want me to remove it: > > /home/lost+found# rm \#0000005 > override r-------- root/operator snapshot for #0000005? n Are you sure that it doesn't want to remove it? It's just asking you the question (maybe because you executed rm as non-root or maybe because of the mode of the file); you can answer 'yes', you know. > Is there a magic "shapshot" flag on the file? Have I somehow damaged my > ufs2+softupdates filesystem by losing its inode #5 containing snapshot > data? > > Any insights appreciated, You can try stat(1) on it to see all the details, that could help with further conclusions. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47CF0F7D.3050805>