From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 14:49:40 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82255106568D for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:49:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patfbsd@davenulle.org) Received: from smtp.lamaiziere.net (net.lamaiziere.net [91.121.44.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45C048FC08 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:49:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from baby-jane.lamaiziere.net (106.10.87-79.rev.gaoland.net [79.87.10.106]) by smtp.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 56333633322; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:49:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from baby-jane.lamaiziere.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by baby-jane.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8EE1BDDC; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:50:18 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:50:17 +0200 From: Patrick Lamaiziere To: Aristedes Maniatis Message-ID: <20090917165017.313734cc@baby-jane.lamaiziere.net> In-Reply-To: <4AB21EFA.2080507@ish.com.au> References: <20090917132127.2a0ee973@baby-jane.lamaiziere.net> <4AB21EFA.2080507@ish.com.au> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i386-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [ZFS] panic vm_fault : fault on no fault entry X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:49:40 -0000 Le Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:35:22 +1000, Aristedes Maniatis a =E9crit : > On 17/09/09 9:21 PM, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote: > > /boot/loader.conf > > # ZFS > > vm.kmem_size=3D"512M" > > vm.kmem_size_max=3D"512M" > > vfs.zfs.arc_max=3D"40M" > > vfs.zfs.vdev.cache.size=3D"5M" >=20 > I believe that ever since 7.2 (and definitely in 8) these settings > are no longer needed and the auto-tuning of ZFS is superior to > setting them explicitly. At any rate the arc_max looks really really > small. Well, Without it panics too. I'm on i386, not amd64.