From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 4 05:38:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD580106566B for ; Sun, 4 Oct 2009 05:38:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from outbound-mail-117.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-117.bluehost.com [69.89.22.17]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 893998FC13 for ; Sun, 4 Oct 2009 05:38:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31613 invoked by uid 0); 4 Oct 2009 05:38:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by outboundproxy3.bluehost.com with SMTP; 4 Oct 2009 05:38:44 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=RImgldjyiI7sBTSlk1nSakI3yGDhlC9qUTqPnro/gv31npTLgaqDASRY+T8048bX6S0sYTHPgK2gBSGi+ggltfoOWXYrtc4Krvt/8TcWk1Gf/fbosnTaFEqEk6FzGpcw; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kukaburra.hydra) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MuJnv-0005sF-Tn for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 03 Oct 2009 23:38:44 -0600 Received: by kukaburra.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 3 Oct 2009 23:31:24 -0600 Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 23:31:24 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20091004053123.GA37100@guilt.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <28f938b10910021725p7e615617xf21639d3fb7fcc9d@mail.gmail.com> <4AC6A26E.9080405@gmail.com> <4297a9020910021815p60858505w89abbfa909b99340@mail.gmail.com> <20091003045640.GA28502@guilt.hydra> <5a3c8f450910022228k3c196b6ay1acc3031716d673d@mail.gmail.com> <4AC70238.1000209@infracaninophile.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AC70238.1000209@infracaninophile.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2009 05:38:45 -0000 --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 08:50:16AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: >=20 > Google apparently favours HTML-5 as their future direction, rather than > Flash. And where YouTube goes, the rest of the world will surely follow, > at least as far as Video streaming is concerned. Oh, thank goodness. Flash video is a blight. --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkrIMysACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKVhIQCfZSXgqP+e4sI8GaYJU1KwTw40 RZcAn0OE0Up53c31QySNoJ+XUN+CqwmP =Ygi1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb--