From owner-cvs-all Fri Feb 13 15:23:09 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA01037 for cvs-all-outgoing; Fri, 13 Feb 1998 15:23:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA00680; Fri, 13 Feb 1998 15:21:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA03207; Fri, 13 Feb 1998 15:20:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from UNKNOWN(), claiming to be "current1.whistle.com" via SMTP by alpo.whistle.com, id smtpd003185; Fri Feb 13 15:19:58 1998 Date: Fri, 13 Feb 1998 15:16:10 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer To: Mike Smith cc: Paul Traina , core@FreeBSD.ORG, junichi@jp.freebsd.org, committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: wfd block major number reassignment from 24 to 1 In-Reply-To: <199802132309.PAA04995@dingo.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > > Wrong. > > The issue I am raising is specific to 2.2. The SLICE code gets it > right, and I am 100% behind committing to that for 3.0, providing we > have a workable answer to the persistence question, and a resolution on > the appropriate techniques for disk metainformation management. > > I was hoping that we could discuss that at the SFBUG last night. 8( sorry I had other engagements (as I nearly always do on Thursday..) We had our own version on Wed, with John D, kirk, and a few whistleites pitty You werent there ;-b julian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message