From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Sep 16 09:34:45 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA08530 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Wed, 16 Sep 1998 09:34:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from news1.gtn.com (news1.gtn.com [192.109.159.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA08495; Wed, 16 Sep 1998 09:34:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.gtn.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by news1.gtn.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) with UUCP id SAA14200; Wed, 16 Sep 1998 18:30:08 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from andreas@localhost) by klemm.gtn.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id SAA26733; Wed, 16 Sep 1998 18:06:22 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas) Message-ID: <19980916180621.A25788@klemm.gtn.com> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 1998 18:06:21 +0200 From: Andreas Klemm To: William Bulley Cc: mwlucas@exceptionet.com, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG, torstenb@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: merit radius detail files? References: <19980915222329.A19161@klemm.gtn.com> <199809161301.JAA06441@ohm.merit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i In-Reply-To: <199809161301.JAA06441@ohm.merit.edu>; from William Bulley on Wed, Sep 16, 1998 at 09:01:50AM -0400 X-Disclaimer: A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT SMP Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, Sep 16, 1998 at 09:01:50AM -0400, William Bulley wrote: > According to Andreas Klemm: > > > > What about asking the port maintainer to update the port or even > > better to send diffs after doing the update yourself ? > > 1) I don't know who the "port maintainer" is... In the ports directory there is a Makefile. Within the Makefile there is a line MAINTAINER= e-mail-address > 2) I'm not certain what "updating the port" means and if that would > be considered (by the FreeBSD folks) as risking copyright issues Ports collection is a Berkeley make Macro mechanism. A "make all install" does everything from fetching from internet, extract source in workdir, doing local changes via patches, compiling, installing ... everything automatically. See http://www.freebsd.org/ports > 3) there are no diffs, each release is self-contained and stands > by itself, once we release, the old version is considered obsolete But this release has a certain name and needs perhaps other local diffs to make it into /usr/local ... and it has perhaps other installed files, so the ports PLIST file needs certainly an update, which is needed to install and remove ported software cleanly. > If there are no legal entanglements (I'm not a lawyer!), then I > think having the FreeBSD "port" reference our FTP site would be > fine. I think the only problem is in having the FreeBSD CD-ROM > or ports collection also include (and hence distribute) our code. Then the port gets a variable NO_CDROM in the Makefile .... -- Andreas Klemm http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas What gives you 90% more speed, for example, in kernel compilation ? http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~fsmp/SMP/akgraph-a/graph1.html "NT = Not Today" (Maggie Biggs) ``powered by FreeBSD SMP'' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message