From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Nov  4 08:50:27 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD82C16A4CF
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Thu,  4 Nov 2004 08:50:27 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 893D643D1F
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Thu,  4 Nov 2004 08:50:16 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iA48oFI0039431;
	Thu, 4 Nov 2004 09:50:15 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
To: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 04 Nov 2004 00:48:11 PST."
             <20041104004811.A57935@xorpc.icir.org> 
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 09:50:15 +0100
Message-ID: <39430.1099558215@critter.freebsd.dk>
Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk
cc: arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: HEADSUP: HZ=1000 by default on i386 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture
	<freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 08:50:27 -0000

In message <20041104004811.A57935@xorpc.icir.org>, Luigi Rizzo writes:
>On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 09:44:45AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> 
>> We increasingly need better granularity in our sleep/wakeup calls and
>> things like device polling and trafic shaping needs higher granularity
>> in particular.
>
>are you trying to put the blame on me ?  :)

No, but I can do it if you want me to :-)

Seriously, this is just long overdue, we've been talking about it
since the 4.x branch.


-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.