Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 14:37:38 -0400 From: Bush Doctor <dervish@goku.cl.msu.edu> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Kent Stewart <kstewart@3-cities.com> Subject: Re: A question on port building? Message-ID: <20000413143738.A56628@goku.cl.msu.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004130210560.65600-100000@freefall.freebsd.org>; from kris@FreeBSD.org on Thu, Apr 13, 2000 at 02:11:32AM -0700 References: <20000412133914.B87373@goku.cl.msu.edu> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004130210560.65600-100000@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Out of da blue Kris Kennaway aka (kris@FreeBSD.org) said: > On Wed, 12 Apr 2000, Bush Doctor wrote: > > > This question arises from something I noticed when trying to > > build codecrusader. (Thanxs to Kent) It seems that codecrusader > > depends on bison during its build process. Now that bison is part > > of the system, is it sufficient to have "USE_BISON=yes" in the > > Makefile? I'm asking because I see from bsd.port.mk > > Bison was ripped back out of the base system in 4.0. Hence USE_BISON :-) Thanxs Kris. I need to build a tool that'll identify obsolete bits in the tree so they can be removed. > > Most ports don't need it. Just tested the lastest patches I have and codecrusader is one of the few ports that uses bison. The bison question was the last issue. send-pr to follow ... ;-) > > Kris > > ---- > In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. > -- Charles Forsythe <forsythe@alum.mit.edu> > #;^) -- f u cn rd ths, u cn gt a gd jb n cmptr prgrmmng. bush doctor <dervish@goku.cl.msu.edu> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000413143738.A56628>