From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Aug  6 18:19:22 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id SAA28303
          for current-outgoing; Sun, 6 Aug 1995 18:19:22 -0700
Received: from haven.uniserve.com (haven.uniserve.com [198.53.215.121])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id SAA28296
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 6 Aug 1995 18:19:11 -0700
Received: by haven.uniserve.com id <30751>; Sun, 6 Aug 1995 18:19:40 +0100
Date: 	Sun, 6 Aug 1995 18:19:33 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tom Samplonius <tom@uniserve.com>
To: Terry Lambert <terry@cs.weber.edu>
cc: swallace@eng.uci.edu, current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bare bones kernel
In-Reply-To: <9508070030.AA23718@cs.weber.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.950806181802.673C-100000@haven.uniserve.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: current-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk


On Sun, 6 Aug 1995, Terry Lambert wrote:

> > On Sun, 6 Aug 1995, Steven Wallace wrote:
> > 
> > > Could someone explain to me why you must have "options FFS" and
> > 
> >   A kernel without a filesystem?  That won't work.
> 
> How about a kernel with a non-VFS file system?

  That would be a nice party trick, but would removing all those 
dependencies really be worth it?

Tom