From owner-freebsd-alpha Wed Oct 14 17:48:05 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA28133 for freebsd-alpha-outgoing; Wed, 14 Oct 1998 17:48:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from calis.BlackSun.org (slip-ppp-4-198.escape.com [205.160.46.198]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA28122 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 1998 17:48:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from don@calis.BlackSun.org) Received: from localhost (don@localhost) by calis.BlackSun.org (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id IAA13548; Thu, 15 Oct 1998 08:48:13 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from don@calis.BlackSun.org) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1998 08:48:13 -0400 (EDT) From: Don To: Terry Lambert cc: alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PALcode In-Reply-To: <199810142253.PAA02551@usr04.primenet.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > I think the same argument is possible inre: Intel hardware, isn't > it? It may be but if I wanted the 32 bit limitations that the NT PALcode imposes I would not have bought Alphas, I would have bought Intel machines. (I am referring to nothing but the 32 bit limited NT PALcode here) -Don To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message