Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 14:42:48 -0800 From: Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> To: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/ports-mgmt Makefile ports/ports-mgmt/pkg_cleanup Makefile pkg-descr ports/ports-mgmt/pkg_cleanup/files Makefile pkg_cleanup.1 pkg_cleanup.c Message-ID: <477EB668.3090400@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200801041328.m04DSp6h096405@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200801041328.m04DSp6h096405@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Pav Lucistnik wrote: > Modified files: > ports-mgmt Makefile > Added files: > ports-mgmt/pkg_cleanup Makefile pkg-descr > ports-mgmt/pkg_cleanup/files Makefile pkg_cleanup.1 > pkg_cleanup.c Is there a standard policy for when a port's source code should be included in the ports tree instead of in a separate distfile which is fetched on demand? Colin Percival
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?477EB668.3090400>