Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 15:55:43 +0200 From: Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org> To: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> Cc: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Proposal on shared libs version values. Message-ID: <20010213155542.A71042@rapier.smartspace.co.za> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0102131349340.62815-100000@herring.nlsystems.com>; from dfr@nlsystems.com on Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 01:53:29PM %2B0000 References: <200102130654.f1D6sIU59242@mobile.wemm.org> <Pine.BSF.4.31.0102131349340.62815-100000@herring.nlsystems.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue 2001-02-13 (13:53), Doug Rabson wrote: > > Peter Wemm wrote: > > > Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > > > Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com> writes: > > > > > Well, it almost works but falls over during the build of perl: > > > > > > > > This is an unrelated bug which the patch uncovers, Peter just fixed it > > > > an hour ago. Update your sources and try again. > > > > > > A post-perl-fix buildworld finished while I drove home. An installworld is > > > in progress.. > > > > The tail of which just ended with the usual: > > > > ... > > > > gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe > > > > I don't understand. If this build was with the version number bumped to > 501, what is is causing the problem. > > In general, if we can construct a build which actually works, I fully > support the idea of using three digit version numbers during development. > The last thing we need is for people to waste valuable development time > working around version number problems. It could be the openssh sigpipe thing that Matt Dillon was looking at. Neil -- Neil Blakey-Milner nbm@mithrandr.moria.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010213155542.A71042>