Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 22:02:15 -0800 From: "Crist J. Clark" <cristjc@earthlink.net> To: Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs(1) Update and CVS/Entries Message-ID: <20011110220215.F69195@blossom.cjclark.org> In-Reply-To: <9sknop$jvo$1@kemoauc.mips.inka.de>; from naddy@mips.inka.de on Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 02:28:41AM %2B0000 References: <20011108160202.L51134@blossom.cjclark.org> <9sknop$jvo$1@kemoauc.mips.inka.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 02:28:41AM +0000, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Crist J. Clark <cjclark@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
[snip]
> > Even though the modification time of CVS/Entries is changed
> > everytime, those directories are not added.
>
> Like it or not, that's a feature. Those directories where not
> checked out into this parent directory. CVS doesn't know about
> them, so it purposely ignores them. CVS will not pick up random
> files lying around and add or sync them to the repository. That
> they happen to share the names of directories already in the
> repository doesn't matter. Things either need to have been checked
> out or added.
They were added by CVS... I think.
> > Am I not doing something correctly.
>
> I don't know how you created this particular situation, but you
> must have done something wrong along the way.
Those ports have been added since I initially did a 'cvs co' of the
ports tree. I would have expected CVS to have added them to
'CVS/Entries' when it first added those directories in a 'cvs up'. I
am not sure why it didn't. Oh, well. I'll just do some surgery the
'Entries' and be done with it. Thanks for the response.
--
Crist J. Clark | cjclark@alum.mit.edu
| cjclark@jhu.edu
http://people.freebsd.org/~cjc/ | cjc@freebsd.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011110220215.F69195>