From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jun 10 17:54:28 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2844D33B15E for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 17:54:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [204.107.128.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49hvkq2m5rz4L5R for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 17:54:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [198.74.231.63]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D1EA650D1 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 17:54:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fledge.watson.org (doug@localhost.watson.org [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 05AHsP63022171 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 13:54:25 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id 05AHsOZj022168 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 13:54:24 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 13:54:24 -0400 (EDT) From: doug Reply-To: doug@safeport.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Mailing List Etiquette was freebsd vs. netbsd In-Reply-To: <250b853a-b436-0e99-b05c-9abd6b6019ef@panix.com> Message-ID: References: <171506d5-19aa-359e-c21d-f07257c52ebd@freenetMail.de> <62d10000-e068-922e-23bd-f7a61e7a4e89@anatoli.ws> <6a4f6a15-ec43-03f6-1a41-a109e445f026@anatoli.ws> <00225a04-237d-9051-9aea-12c192106a20@anatoli.ws> <373EDB20-C750-42E2-A41B-EA61F6E49807@kicp.uchicago.edu> <20200609120136.00005b3c@seibercom.net> <2393a1e0-b073-950a-78be-9f57d8e9934b@anatoli.ws> <20200610063555.00003707@seibercom.net> <82F57D0D-E0EC-49F7-824E-20A296C9F549@kicp.uchicago.edu> <250b853a-b436-0e99-b05c-9abd6b6019ef@panix.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49hvkq2m5rz4L5R X-Spamd-Bar: +++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of doug@fledge.watson.org has no SPF policy when checking 204.107.128.30) smtp.mailfrom=doug@fledge.watson.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [3.54 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[doug@safeport.com]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.65)[0.649]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; REPLYTO_DOM_NEQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.94)[0.938]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.95)[0.949]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[watson.org]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11288, ipnet:204.107.128.0/24, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 17:54:28 -0000 On Wed, 10 Jun 2020, Kurt Hackenberg wrote: > On 2020-06-10 10:15, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > >> Jerry, I?ll try to keep it in mind. It often is so that messages come > addressed to a person and are merely CCed to the list. I have learned to > ?reply all? to avoid message going to just a person, but not to the list. I > know, this is my laziness to blame which I will try to mitigate. See https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/mailing-list-faq/etiquette.html#idp44832888 which the above line vio0lates, but no spaces, what can I do :) Says nothing about CC-ing. For me personally, I rather like getting cc'd because I read questions on a totally different system as I get too much email to my business/personal emails to add questions to the mix. If the current thinking is different from the above article please let me know. If you were cc'd on the netbsd thread that was indeed a lot of emails tossed to people that may not have wished to get them.