From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 8 01:33:50 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF46FA93 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 01:33:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EABA256A for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 01:33:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r981XoZO031437; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 18:33:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id r981Xore031436; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 18:33:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 18:33:50 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: George Mitchell Subject: Re: [Heads Up] RCS removed from base Message-ID: <20131008013350.GB31261@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20131007150658.GA79233@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <52534B5E.7010401@freebsd.org> <20131008002854.GB56872@funkthat.com> <525354C2.8070807@m5p.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <525354C2.8070807@m5p.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 01:33:50 -0000 On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 08:41:38PM -0400, George Mitchell wrote: > On 10/07/13 20:28, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > Julian Elischer wrote this message on Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 08:01 +0800: > >> not a big thing but I believe that a lot of poeple use ci/co on /etc > >> becasue it is "just there" > > > > +1 > > > Folks, this is just plain a major violation of the Principle of Least > Amazement. RCS is ideal for keeping track of my configuration files > in /etc. What do we gain by removing it? Less GPL code in FreeBSD? -- Steve