From owner-freebsd-current Sat Jan 1 15:54:34 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from alcanet.com.au (border.alcanet.com.au [203.62.196.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED75D14FB9 for ; Sat, 1 Jan 2000 15:54:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jeremyp@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au) Received: by border.alcanet.com.au id <40326>; Sun, 2 Jan 2000 10:47:29 +1100 Content-return: prohibited From: Peter Jeremy Subject: Re: gcc compiler problem part deux To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Message-Id: <00Jan2.104729est.40326@border.alcanet.com.au> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2000 10:47:24 +1100 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I wrote: >Last time I checked (I haven't moved to the latest gcc, so I can't >confirm it there), one significant difference between 'cc -E' and >/usr/libexec/cpp was that the latter would read from a pipe, whilst >the former wouldn't. It seems I was wrong. As several people have pointed out, both 'cc -E -' and 'cc -x c -E /dev/stdin' work. I'll crawl back into the woodwork for a while :-). Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message