Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 27 Nov 2025 10:12:18 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        net@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 290768] if_wg(4): handshake response has src and dst reverse
Message-ID:  <bug-290768-7501-XooChxyScV@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-290768-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-290768-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=290768

--- Comment #27 from relvy <it@vineyard-sha.de> ---
(In reply to relvy from comment #26)

> > Was PF or IPFW used? Or perhaps IPF in this case ?

> OpnSense uses pf for filter/nat/scrub and ipfw for dummynet shaper (if shaper rules are enabled)

I realized that I use traffic shaper to target bufferbloat.

In the testbed I removed the traffic shaper and still reproduced the issue.

At the very least this rules out IPFW and IPF.
PF is still on.

There are two PF commits that look interesting to me:

https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/sys?id=c12013f5bb3819e64499f02ecd199a635003c7ce
https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/sys?id=7dedc3c21436bb5a1220f8901992d2772a163f78

Let me know what you think.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-290768-7501-XooChxyScV>