From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Feb 5 15:47:23 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from gandalf.vi.bravenet.com (gandalf.bravenet.com [139.142.105.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 189E737B6A0 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 15:47:06 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 22656 invoked by uid 1000); 5 Feb 2001 23:46:36 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 5 Feb 2001 23:46:36 -0000 Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 15:46:36 -0800 (PST) From: Dan Phoenix To: Gary Geisbert Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: qmail IO problems In-Reply-To: <3A7F27E1.5C5B5C0@e-centives.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG well tried that.....now qmail-qstat take a very long time to return queue numbers now...and not much has changed! On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Gary Geisbert wrote: > Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 17:23:29 -0500 > From: Gary Geisbert > To: Dan Phoenix , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: qmail IO problems > > Dan Phoenix wrote: > > > > I/O. Checking on qmail queue patches maybe? Far as I know there is a > > big-to do patch on qmail's homesite....not sure if that will help but > > Definately go for the big-todo patch -- depending on the size of your > average queue, you will see a very considerable performance gain. The > problem you're seeing is because of the large number of files per > directory in /var/qmail/queue/todo. Changing conf-split to be ~500, > alongside the big-todo patch will yield far better performance. > > ~Gary > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message