From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 29 01:55:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE46A1065670 for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 01:55:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nzp@riseup.net) Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [204.13.164.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C45748FC16 for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 01:55:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from spoonbill.riseup.net (spoonbill-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.64]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60099191089 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 18:37:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: nzp@spoonbill.riseup.net) with ESMTPSA id 3E42C9F6C Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 03:37:53 +0200 From: Nikola =?utf-8?B?UGF2bG92acSH?= To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110429013753.GB7154@sputnjik.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20110428104912.1327aa49@seibercom.net> <20110428152028.GS1733@albert.catwhisker.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110428152028.GS1733@albert.catwhisker.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97 at mx1 X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: netpbm-10.35.80_2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 01:55:51 -0000 On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 08:20:28AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:49:12AM -0400, Jerry wrote: > > The "netpbm-10.35.80_2" port won't build. There is a notation that the > > previous version has to be removed first. I saw something here a few > > days ago regarding that problem. Is the recommended method to do a > > "make deinstall && make reinstall" to get the updated port installed? I > > know that portupgrade chocks on the port if a previous version is > > installed. > > .... > > As (I) documented in ports/156577, what worked for me was: > > pkg_delete -f netpbm-10.26.64_4 > portmaster graphics/netpbm > > I subsequently heard from one person who reported that this did not work > for him. > > For convenince: . > Yes, there was an error in the makefile. I had to leave the machine and didn't have time to investigate further, but it was fixed later that day[1][2], and the deinstall/install procedure worked fine after that. [1] [2] -- Hark ye, Clinker, you are a most notorious offender. You stand convicted of sickness, hunger, wretchedness, and want. -- Tobias Smollet