From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Fri Aug 10 06:16:38 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DCD3105D967 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 06:16:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from kib.kiev.ua (kib.kiev.ua [IPv6:2001:470:d5e7:1::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0050C7AF39 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 06:16:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from tom.home (kib@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kib.kiev.ua (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w7A6GRJ6028239 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 10 Aug 2018 09:16:30 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 kib.kiev.ua w7A6GRJ6028239 Received: (from kostik@localhost) by tom.home (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w7A6GQRU028238; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 09:16:26 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: tom.home: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 09:16:26 +0300 From: Konstantin Belousov To: Rick Macklem Cc: "freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org" , peter@holm.cc Subject: Re: ffs_truncate3 panics Message-ID: <20180810061626.GB2649@kib.kiev.ua> References: <20180807131445.GC1884@kib.kiev.ua> <20180808221647.GH1884@kib.kiev.ua> <20180809111004.GK1884@kib.kiev.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FREEMAIL_FROM,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on tom.home X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 06:16:38 -0000 On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 08:38:50PM +0000, Rick Macklem wrote: > I did notice that my code locks the vnode first and then calls vn_start_write() > for the vn_extattr_set() calls, whereas the syscall code locks the vnode after the vn_start_write() call. > > Does that matter? Yes, it matter. It would cause deadlocks when corresponding filesystem is suspended in parallel with NFSD activities. vn_start_write() is a lock, and the correct lock order is vn_start_write()->vnode lock.