From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 10:22:48 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07FEB37B401; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 10:22:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pool-151-200-10-97.res.east.verizon.net (pool-138-88-11-203.res.east.verizon.net [138.88.11.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 822B343FAF; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 10:22:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mtm@identd.net) Received: from kokeb.ambesa.net (kbu4h81mmyysfx5i@localhost [127.0.0.1]) id h6THLQN4009498; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 13:21:26 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mtm@identd.net) Received: (from mtm@localhost) by kokeb.ambesa.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h6THLOEQ009481; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 13:21:24 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mtm@identd.net) X-Authentication-Warning: kokeb.ambesa.net: mtm set sender to mtm@identd.net using -f Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 13:21:23 -0400 From: Mike Makonnen To: Jens Rehsack Message-ID: <20030729172122.GA5005@kokeb.ambesa.net> References: <3F26AA16.5030007@liwing.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F26AA16.5030007@liwing.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD/5.1-CURRENT (i386) cc: Clement Laforet cc: Robert Watson cc: FreeBSD-Current List Subject: Re: [PATCH] jail NG schript patch for mounting devfs and procfs automatically X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:22:48 -0000 On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 07:08:38PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote: > On 29.07.2003 18:47, Robert Watson wrote: > > > >Someone, and unfortunately I appear to have lost track of who, had some > >tweaks to the rcNG scripts to set up some reasonable devfs rules for a > >jail, and apply them to the devfs mounted in a jail. Otherwise, you risk > >exposing "undesired" device nodes to the virtual environment. I suspect a > >search of the -current archives will turn up who, but I think a necessary > >part of a solution here will be to make sure jails are set up with the > >right devfs contents. > > Sorry, overseen. Sct W. Hetzel was the submitter, but it never becomes > committed. If could be be so kind, please :-) (of course, not without > prove it first) Yeah, I'll take care of this. I had asked scott to mail me his final patch so I could commit it, but I never heard back from him. I'll dig out the revisions from my mail archives and combine the two. Cheers. -- Mike Makonnen | GPG-KEY: http://www.identd.net/~mtm/mtm.asc mtm@identd.net | D228 1A6F C64E 120A A1C9 A3AA DAE1 E2AF DBCC 68B9 mtm@FreeBSD.Org| FreeBSD - Unleash the Daemon!