From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Apr 15 08:54:56 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52DC3106564A;
	Sun, 15 Apr 2012 08:54:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com)
Received: from shell0.rawbw.com (shell0.rawbw.com [198.144.192.45])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A4A38FC0A;
	Sun, 15 Apr 2012 08:54:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from eagle.yuri.org (stunnel@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by shell0.rawbw.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3F8si74026461;
	Sun, 15 Apr 2012 01:54:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com)
Message-ID: <4F8A8CD2.5020103@rawbw.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 01:54:42 -0700
From: Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
	rv:10.0.3) Gecko/20120316 Thunderbird/10.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
References: <4F775DF5.1020704@rawbw.com> <4F7CA124.8080401@freebsd.org>
	<CAF6rxg=QHBKUwWEUO2JRP1hYcDVfg4pM_4BTO6jPu1FmPeWDxA@mail.gmail.com>
	<201204051006.11598.jhb@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <201204051006.11598.jhb@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Is there any modern alternative to pstack?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 08:54:56 -0000

On 04/05/2012 07:06, John Baldwin wrote:
> In this case we probably should become the upstream maintainer.  My patch
> actually bumps the version to 1.3 as it is sort of intended to do that.

bsd-pstack on SourceForge is dead. Sole project owner isn't responsive, 
and as per SF policy they don't allow anyone to take over such project. 
They suggest to fork.
So will you object if I create a new project on SF, say bsd-pstack-new, 
will import the current source and apply your patch and make a release?
I will also update pstack port so that it will become current.

Yuri