From owner-freebsd-ports  Fri Nov 10  1:18: 9 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from ady.warpnet.ro (ns2.warpnet.ro [194.153.243.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2291137B479; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 01:18:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (ady@localhost)
	by ady.warpnet.ro (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA64725;
	Fri, 10 Nov 2000 11:20:49 +0200 (EET)
	(envelope-from ady@freebsd.ady.ro)
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 11:20:49 +0200 (EET)
From: Adrian Penisoara <ady@freebsd.ady.ro>
X-Sender: ady@ady.warpnet.ro
To: Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami <asami@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com>, Jimmy <olgeni@uli.it>,
	ports@FreeBSD.ORG, pine@freebsd.ady.ro, kris@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: 4.2 BETA ISO image
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10011101056270.63824-100000@ady.warpnet.ro>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10011101118151.63824-100000@ady.warpnet.ro>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Hi,

On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, Adrian Penisoara wrote:

>   Couldn't these "security offender" ports be made to check for BATCH mode
> or a new IGNORE_SECURITY (or something like that) mark which should
> disable interactive dialogs? Then sysinstall would set that environment
> variable and be able to install these packages. What's your opinion ?
> 

 Even more: at building time check for BATCH mode, at install time check
for NON_INTERACTIVE (or IGNORE_SECURITY)... That should be a rule for all
ports.

 Ady (@freebsd.ady.ro)



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message