From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Nov  4 19:50:02 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3619E106566C
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Fri,  4 Nov 2011 19:50:02 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from armin@frozen-zone.org)
Received: from mx.inode.at (mx20.lb01.inode.at [62.99.145.22])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA8A38FC1C
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Fri,  4 Nov 2011 19:50:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [84.119.18.197] (port=5247 helo=fz-sub1.local)
	by smartmx-20.inode.at with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <armin@frozen-zone.org>)
	id 1RMPm4-0003XO-Bs; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 20:50:00 +0100
Message-ID: <4EB441B6.9000400@frozen-zone.org>
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 20:49:10 +0100
From: Armin Pirkovitsch <armin@frozen-zone.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
	rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111007 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de>
References: <20111104132640.GA1378@tiny> <4EB43AB0.4030107@frozen-zone.org>
	<20111104193543.GA1188@tiny>
In-Reply-To: <20111104193543.GA1188@tiny>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 10-CURRENT && ports/security/p11-kit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 19:50:02 -0000

On 11/04/11 20:35, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día Friday, November 04, 2011 a las 08:19:12PM +0100, Armin Pirkovitsch escribió:
>
>>> ports/security/p11-kit (requested by ports/graphics/evince via gnome)
>>> does not build:
>>>
>>
>> Just wondering - have you looked at UPDATING? - especially:
>>
>> 20110928:
>>     AFFECTS: users of 10-current
>>     AUTHOR: eadler@FreeBSD.org
>>
>>     There are known issues installing ports on FreeBSD 10+ due to
>>     bogus assumptions by various build scripts. This will not be fixed
>>     until 9-RELEASE is released.
>> ...
>
> I have read this and I have in /etc/make.conf the following lines:
>
> # From: "b. f."<bf1783@googlemail.com>
> # To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
> # Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 13:42:50 -0400
> #
> # No, it is not the same.  You can either masquerade, by setting UNAME_r
> # and OSVERSION, or by editing the headers and scripts that define them;
> # or you can use WITH_FBSD10_FIX for ports that define HAS_CONFIGURE
> # (which is implied by USE_AUTOTOOLS and GNU_CONFIGURE).  Right now the
> # masquerading is probably safer, because there are some problems with
> # the fix that are still being resolved -- and a few ports that may fail
> # despite the fix.  But of course if you help to test without
> # masquerading, these problems will be resolved sooner.
> #
> WITH_FBSD10_FIX=1
>
> and most of the ports I'm using are compiling now; the port mentioned
> here does not (not even with UNAME_r) and I wanted to bring this to the
> attention of the maintainer and others;

Would have been useful if you had written that in the first place I guess...