From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 11 19:31:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6793216A407; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 19:31:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=julian=4328b7b2f@elischer.org) Received: from a50.ironport.com (a50.ironport.com [63.251.108.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 522C543D91; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 19:31:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from prvs=julian=4328b7b2f@elischer.org) Received: from unknown (HELO [10.251.18.229]) ([10.251.18.229]) by a50.ironport.com with ESMTP; 11 Oct 2006 12:31:32 -0700 Message-ID: <452D4693.6010606@elischer.org> Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 12:31:31 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Macintosh/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeremie Le Hen References: <451F6E8E.8020301@freebsd.org> <20061011102106.GY1594@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> In-Reply-To: <20061011102106.GY1594@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 20:51:11 +0000 Cc: freebsd security , security-officer@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: [fbsd] HEADS UP: FreeBSD 5.3, 5.4, 6.0 EoLs coming soon X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 19:31:41 -0000 Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 12:30:22AM -0700, FreeBSD Security Officer wrote: > >> Users of FreeBSD 4.11 systems are also reminded that that FreeBSD 4.11 >> will reach its End of Life at the end of January 2007 and that they >> should be making plans to upgrade or replace such systems. >> > > Though I admit RELENG_4 is getting dusty, it is not rusty. I believe it > is still used in many places because of its stability and performance. > > For instance, according to Julian Elischer's posts, it seems he is still > working on it. > Weeeeeeellllll, we (Ironport) just moved to 6.1 but my previous employer (Vicor) is still using it. > Is it envisageable to extend the RELENG_4's and RELENG_4_11's EoL once > more ? > > Thank you. > Regards, >