From owner-cvs-include  Thu Dec  5 08:19:23 1996
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-include>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id IAA17042
          for cvs-include-outgoing; Thu, 5 Dec 1996 08:19:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id IAA17030;
          Thu, 5 Dec 1996 08:18:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.4/8.6.9) with ESMTP id IAA11282; Thu, 5 Dec 1996 08:18:57 -0800 (PST)
To: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@freefall.freebsd.org>
cc: jkh@freefall.freebsd.org (Jordan K. Hubbard),
        CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org,
        cvs-include@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/include utmp.h 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 05 Dec 1996 06:34:26 PST."
             <199612051434.GAA10379@freefall.freebsd.org> 
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 1996 08:18:57 -0800
Message-ID: <11278.849802737@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-cvs-include@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> I hear BSDI increase UT_HOSTSIZE to 32, do we plan to make similar change?
> (I don't have BSDI box to be shure)

I haven't had anyone even raise the issue (until just now), so I'm not
sure how much demand there is for this.  Any other opinions?  Something
we should do just for consistency's sake?

						Jordan