From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 29 00:16:41 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3611716A46C for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 00:16:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from outC.internet-mail-service.net (outC.internet-mail-service.net [216.240.47.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2370A13C4B0 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 00:16:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from mx0.idiom.com (HELO idiom.com) (216.240.32.160) by out.internet-mail-service.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:47:40 -0700 Received: from [10.251.22.38] (nat.ironport.com [63.251.108.100]) by idiom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28C3C125B1D; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 17:16:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <460B0567.40706@elischer.org> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 17:16:39 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Macintosh/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ivan Voras References: <6F52125FD798AC9E4A28A778@ganymede.hub.org> <46092E7E.402@fer.hr> In-Reply-To: <46092E7E.402@fer.hr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: TDFS ... or other distributed file system technologies for FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 00:16:41 -0000 Ivan Voras wrote: > Francisco Reyes wrote: >> Ivan Voras writes: >> >>>> a. anyone is using his current code at all? >>> >>> Judging by the feedback I got (i.e. practically none), I doubt >>> anyone's using it. >> >> Perhaps not many people are aware of it. > > I've mentioned it many times to get attention :) > >> Is there a new version planned? I see the last revision was on Jan 2006. > > No, due to reasons I mentioned before: lack of time on my part, lack of > interest from others - this was something I did because it interests me, > but I don't need it (yet...) in production, so - it's where it is. > > (I didn't abandon it - the problem still interests me and I hope I will > re-visit it some time). > >> Do you have a URL for that other project? > > No, but the idea is to make a nullfs-like thing that exports file OPs > remotely. Way more complex than TDFS. > I believe Matt Dillon has taken this to extremes in Dragonfly..