From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Tue Oct 9 06:43:05 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D72D410C1D34 for ; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 06:43:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net) Received: from puchar.net (puchar.net [194.1.144.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "puchar.net", Issuer "puchar.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57CFB786AB for ; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 06:43:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net) Received: Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by puchar.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w996h0ch042321 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 9 Oct 2018 08:43:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from puchar-wojtek@puchar.net) Received: from localhost (puchar-wojtek@localhost) by puchar.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id w996gtnK042318; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 08:42:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from puchar-wojtek@puchar.net) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 08:42:55 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Peter Jeremy cc: Wojciech Puchar , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ntpd strange problem In-Reply-To: <20181009052924.GJ21091@server.rulingia.com> Message-ID: References: <20181005061829.GG21091@server.rulingia.com> <1538855151.14264.54.camel@freebsd.org> <20181009052924.GJ21091@server.rulingia.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2018 06:43:06 -0000 >> Strange but today (4 days after i restarted ntpd) it seems to be in sync > > A couple of suggestions: > * (especially if you have an ADSL link): The NTP protocol assumes that > the path between the client and server are have symmetric timing. In i have gigabit connectivity with low and stable delays. so it's not this. > my experience, bulk uploads or downloads can cause significant path > delay asymmetries, which can confuse ntpd. > * You only have a single server and are therefore dependent on the > trustworthiness of that server. A few more servers could be useful. this server is quite (actually excellently) stable and i trust it.