From owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Thu Mar 2 00:09:39 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34B80CF4A26 for ; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 00:09:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24C6EB36 for ; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 00:09:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v2209cew051152 for ; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 00:09:39 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 194513] zfs recv hangs in state kmem arena Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:09:38 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: daveb@spectralogic.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:09:39 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D194513 Dave Baukus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |daveb@spectralogic.com --- Comment #21 from Dave Baukus --- (In reply to Steven Hartland from comment #10) Is it possible that the referenced change does not have enough of a positive effect with respect to zfs receive pending in kmem_arena because zfs receiv= e is attempting to allocate SPA_MAXBLOCKSIZE (16M) and the fragmentation check is looking for fragmentation below zfs_max_recordsize (1M) ? /* * Above limits know nothing about real level of KVA fragmentation. * Start aggressive reclamation if too little sequential KVA left. */ if (vmem_size(heap_arena, VMEM_MAXFREE) < zfs_max_recordsize) return (1); --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=