Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1998 10:09:03 -0600 From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: alk@pobox.com Cc: nate@mt.sri.com, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Daemonising a Java Process: Possible? Message-ID: <199809091609.KAA14035@mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <13814.41946.450831.565822@compound.east> References: <13813.27934.606377.693358@compound.east> <199809082154.WAA00626@fdy2.demon.co.uk> <199809091441.IAA13097@mt.sri.com> <13814.41946.450831.565822@compound.east>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> : For what it's worth, I've been on the phone with TowerJ lately, and > : there is *definite* interest in their providing a native FreeBSD port of > : their product, which is essentially a executable maker. Given that our > : JDK is a poor performer but is now pretty stable, this is a good thing. > : If/when it happens I plan on 'converting' the development tools into > : executables, which should also speed up performance. > > I was using the Linux version with no problems, for as long as the > demo license lasted. It does speed performance by an order of > magnitude. Cool. > I ended up relying upon the towerized native version of > the pizza compiler, since javac was so buggy (both on solaris and > fbsd) and interpreted was so slow (on bsd). Can you qualify that statement? In my experience, we've had more problems with the pizza compiler than the Solaris compiler. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199809091609.KAA14035>