Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:56:32 -0500 From: Jeremy Messenger <mezz.freebsd@gmail.com> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> Cc: "A.J. Kehoe IV \(Nanoman\)" <nanoman@nanoman.ca>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Michael Gmelin <freebsd@grem.de> Subject: Re: HAVE_GNOME vs. bsd.ports.options.mk Message-ID: <CADLFttdH4YghNsK8G8DjfyA6gUsKw79tmtX92NH13V4R9DsWUQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CADLFttfN%2BdEOqWY=7skP40PBwF8mH%2BSu=rYB-M3R-xDKZ5RvbA@mail.gmail.com> References: <20121010121850.039fb6d2@bsd64.grem.de> <20121010102527.GB26497@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20121010123322.0677a829@bsd64.grem.de> <20121010105757.GD26497@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <CADLFttfN%2BdEOqWY=7skP40PBwF8mH%2BSu=rYB-M3R-xDKZ5RvbA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Jeremy Messenger
<mezz.freebsd@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:33:22PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote:
>>> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 12:25:27 +0200
>>> Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:18:50PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote:
>>> > > Hi
>>> > >
>>> > > I noticed that HAVE_GNOME doesn't work properly with
>>> > > bsd.ports.options.mk yet, so
>>> > >
>>> > > .include <bsd.port.options.mk>
>>> > > .if ${HAVE_GNOME:Mgnomelibs}!=""
>>> > > # ...
>>> > > .endif
>>> > > .include <bsd.port.mk>
>>> > >
>>> > > won't work, while this
>>> > >
>>> > > .include <bsd.port.pre.mk>
>>> > > .if ${HAVE_GNOME:Mgnomelibs}!=""
>>> > > # ...
>>> > > .endif
>>> > > .include <bsd.port.post.mk>
>>> > >
>>> > > does.
>>> > >
>>> > > AFAIK bsd.port.pre.mk/bsd.port.post.mk should be replaced by
>>> > > bsd.port.options.mk/bsd.port.mk in the long term, so having this
>>> > > work or documenting a workaround would help port maintainers who are
>>> > > in the process of updating the port structure.
>>> > >
>>> > > Michael
>>> > >
>>> > > --
>>> > > Michael Gmelin
>>> > > _______________________________________________
>>> > > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
>>> > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
>>> > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to
>>> > > "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>>> >
>>> > Which ports are you speaking about? given that HAVE_GNOME:#gnomelibs
>>> > is refering to gnome 1.4 I think this part can safely be dropped out.
>>> >
>>> > regards,
>>> > Bapt
>>>
>>> I'm talking about the feature in general, it also applies to
>>> HAVE_GNOME:Mesound, HAVE_GNOME:Mpygnomeextras etc.
>>>
>>> I stumbled over this while converting polish/gnugadu2 to OptionsNG
>>> (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=172427).
>>>
>>> Michael
>>>
>>> --
>>> Michael Gmelin
>>
>> imho HAVE_GNOME should die, as autodectection of what you have does not fit at
>> all with package building. Thing shouldn't been added magically because they are
>> on your system but only on explicit demand of the maintainer/user.
>
> See here: http://markmail.org/message/vmjueo2chuub5m2p (read all
> threads, please)
>
> I have made suggests on what to do. Please contact with A.J. Kehoe IV.
> I suggested him to create a team to work on get rid of HAVE_GNOME. He
> even has created a wiki page about it at http://wiki.freebsd.org/Gnome
> .
http://wiki.freebsd.org/Gnome#WANT_GNOME_Decommission
> A.J. Kehoe IV, sorry, my time is very limit right now. Maybe now you
> will have more people that can help you after this email. Who knows.
>
> Cheers,
> Mezz
>
>
>> That said I'll have a look at the PR.
>>
>> regards,
>> Bapt
>
>
> --
> mezz.freebsd@gmail.com - mezz@FreeBSD.org
> FreeBSD GNOME Team
> http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org
--
mezz.freebsd@gmail.com - mezz@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD GNOME Team
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLFttdH4YghNsK8G8DjfyA6gUsKw79tmtX92NH13V4R9DsWUQ>