From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 1 02:39:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 298A21065670 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 02:39:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfarmer@predatorlabs.net) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA1758FC0A for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 02:39:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws12 with SMTP id 12so3240393vws.13 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 19:39:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.242.66 with SMTP id lh2mr1386002qcb.118.1288579181615; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 19:39:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.187.71 with HTTP; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 19:39:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [128.95.133.147] In-Reply-To: References: <4CCDBC20.10102@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 19:39:41 -0700 Message-ID: From: Rob Farmer To: Freddie Cash Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD Ports Mailing List Subject: Re: Portmaster 3.1 upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 02:39:46 -0000 On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 14:59, Freddie Cash wrote: > Which is why I mentioned the "more safe" alternative, which you > snipped out of your reply: > =A0pkg_delete -xif portmaster > > Note the extra "i" in the middle, which makes the pkg_delete call > interactive, showing the package name to be deleted, and asking the > user whether that's the correct package to be deleted. In the same vein, why suggest -f ? Looking at the man page, it seems multiple packages can be listed (ie pkg_delete -f portmaster \*) so if someone mistypes, it greatly increases the damage. I don't think anything depends on portmaster so its not really necessary. --=20 Rob Farmer