From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 8 20:05:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AC48106566C for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2010 20:05:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from outbound-mail-158.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-158.bluehost.com [67.222.39.38]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 02D2B8FC1B for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2010 20:05:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24930 invoked by uid 0); 8 Feb 2010 20:05:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by outboundproxy5.bluehost.com with SMTP; 8 Feb 2010 20:05:05 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=WWjj8grS9xK4Ct7Dj6TWS+Sc+VSlAL+tUhiIOfuXOrGIdD0OiMyN430YpcP9Tle1RAtQxGXGA/X9EUzC+oapRKUjgG+MRsrjLSADNlxEMPQZPkfhp9fWV2+9RQT4RhNQ; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kukaburra.hydra) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NeZqw-0005o6-Rl for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 13:05:04 -0700 Received: by kukaburra.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 08 Feb 2010 12:56:29 -0700 Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 12:56:29 -0700 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100208195629.GB8690@guilt.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4B6ED119.2060308@mailinglist.ahhyes.net> <20100207172150.GA59080@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> <4B6F4631.6050501@mailinglist.ahhyes.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XOIedfhf+7KOe/yw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B6F4631.6050501@mailinglist.ahhyes.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: FreeBSD's UFS vs Ext4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:05:10 -0000 --XOIedfhf+7KOe/yw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 10:01:05AM +1100, alex wrote: > Frank Shute wrote: > >On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 01:41:29AM +1100, alex wrote: > > =20 > >>I see a number of factors putting freebsd behind: > >> > >>* The teams stubbornness with compiler/base tools (wont move away from= =20 > >>gcc 4.2.1 because they just cant accept the GPL2) > > > >They don't like the license, that's not stubbornness. >=20 > Wow thats a good reason to use ancient compilers and assemblers. Sometimes, license choice *is* a good reason to make some sacrifices in short-term convenience. --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --XOIedfhf+7KOe/yw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAktwbG0ACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKW5pACgkyiGNhw3yruwRqFNcZrPQdyZ 11AAn2KTiES2taYxkem57bzNPPoAlod8 =QqkW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XOIedfhf+7KOe/yw--