From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed May 14 10:05:26 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA20614 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 14 May 1997 10:05:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cabri.obs-besancon.fr (cabri.obs-besancon.fr [193.52.184.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA20602 for ; Wed, 14 May 1997 10:05:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by cabri.obs-besancon.fr (5.57/Ultrix3.0-C) id AA15654; Wed, 14 May 97 19:05:09 +0100 Date: Wed, 14 May 97 19:05:09 +0100 Message-Id: <9705141805.AA15654@cabri.obs-besancon.fr> From: Jean-Marc Zucconi To: pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com, hasty@rah.star-gate.com, hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <3379F24B.934@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co> (pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co) Subject: Re: Is Thot (WYSIWIG editor) for you? X-Mailer: Emacs Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >>>>> Pedro F Giffuni writes: > Anyway I think Amancio is right; we first have to determine if Thot is > the right editor for our internal documentation. The searching process It seems to me that you still confuse the format and the tool. The right editor is already there since we have vi :-) Document writers are free to use program X oy Y as long as the document format is SGML. It does not matter if the C code in /usr/src/* is written with cat, vi or emacs. Jean-Marc _____________________________________________________________________________ Jean-Marc Zucconi Observatoire de Besancon F 25010 Besancon cedex PGP Key: finger jmz@cabri.obs-besancon.fr =============================================================================