From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 8 21:38:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 113301065672 for ; Sun, 8 Jul 2012 21:38:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBE4E8FC14 for ; Sun, 8 Jul 2012 21:38:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbun3 with SMTP id un3so23396806obb.13 for ; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 14:38:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=1doEZ1qxlHt3nOHm4e89EcH3/ohY8Hubng+UauC+Qcg=; b=qtyx+Ycl8yZxzvIs4UGcCxTnC1btvbyBG81Z0dkX5E7pvqyDl/+/ZB7PETT1mcy8DN h8t9pmcjHlAeqzdBtyJFJCzjtzoxNhDwbGM+EFHZL7cUontyWaI+mBNRAVzViGjFy1g3 Uhq2ZawlAGx694FvzNhd62F7uXFvv71qSzUiU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=1doEZ1qxlHt3nOHm4e89EcH3/ohY8Hubng+UauC+Qcg=; b=ft8DXhTIUW9waayIjDssokGEyjKxw61dqkAwnso7Vn1o7M+VnL6nmcBz6VIs7n0Xm2 vdlkdLolYb8xkh5cypYDfF2Er7XpfNiCdxsyGlarVCOxKvYUhH0XN/LWUaUk/YhenDvK PKg8NrwCTTLTWhCZYTHZBolJjzdMBEKiQo6KeFPtCvgKSTDQ4oHIrY2ppoEaUCd6ngi4 CGK3NWsZBPV4C9Zkk1WJQnVNwjLsYCBonFJ+0bxW0ouF/4dsfADN6zuzy4tybwF9UKSP uwR4VzTjcQ/gMz0xchMGSXXsmHZajEJRArPwPCPLG2hGTucbrTIF7yPdxLyWO8Azme4Z 4O2w== Received: by 10.60.0.164 with SMTP id 4mr39352513oef.4.1341783486394; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 14:38:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: lists@eitanadler.com Received: by 10.182.125.70 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Jul 2012 14:37:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201207081900.q68J08f7088286@repoman.freebsd.org> From: Eitan Adler Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 14:37:36 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Y1d0jPmLBmFnSMrljFQE_3-rSHc Message-ID: To: Xin LI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkrmCGZ16/pRDQSdf+5nwBV4CEQL+1NEodEwEtkk5eztpTuk1liKJmbKguLPUTALh/RT+K8 Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/vuxml vuln.xml X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2012 21:38:07 -0000 On 8 July 2012 12:27, Xin LI wrote: > On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: >> eadler 2012-07-08 19:00:08 UTC > I don't think it's right to assign same identifier to different > issues. For 2.8.9 I think it was: In general, I agree. I wasn't able to determine which issue related to each update when writing this one up. > It seems that OpenX does not release any information about the > vulnerability which is a bad practice in my opinion by the way. My thoughts exactly :) -- Eitan Adler Source & Ports committer X11, Bugbusting teams