Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 20 Sep 1999 11:34:54 -0600
From:      "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@caspian.plutotech.com>
To:        Matt Dillon <dillon@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern vfs_bio.c 
Message-ID:  <199909201734.LAA00382@caspian.plutotech.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 20 Sep 1999 09:19:24 PDT." <199909201619.JAA24480@freefall.freebsd.org> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>dillon      1999/09/20 09:19:24 PDT
>
>  Modified files:
>    sys/kern             vfs_bio.c 
>  Log:
>      Fix bug in brelse() regarding redirtying buffers on B_ERROR.  brelse()
>      improperly ignored the B_INVAL flag when acting on the B_ERROR.
>      If both B_INVAL and B_ERROR are set the buffer is typically out of the
>      underlying device's block range and must be destroyed.  If only B_ERROR
>      is set (for a write), a write error occured and operation remains as it
>      was before:  the buffer must be redirtied to avoid corrupting the
>      filesystem state.

If a device "goes away", how should any pending buffers be marked?  Does a
umount -f cause pending buffers to be B_INVAl'ed?  I'm pretty sure that
we still can't rid the system of the knowledge of a mounted fs for a device
that has disappeared, but I haven't checked recently.

--
Justin


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199909201734.LAA00382>