From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Aug 30 6:50:13 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AEC115193 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 1999 06:50:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id GAA57576; Mon, 30 Aug 1999 06:50:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 06:50:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199908301350.GAA57576@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Vsevolod Lobko Subject: Re: i386/13468: [PATCH] Low ATAPI performance with block devices (sys/i386/isa/atapi.c) Reply-To: Vsevolod Lobko Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR i386/13468; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Vsevolod Lobko To: Sheldon Hearn Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: i386/13468: [PATCH] Low ATAPI performance with block devices (sys/i386/isa/atapi.c) Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 16:40:50 +0300 (EEST) On Mon, 30 Aug 1999, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > > On Mon, 30 Aug 1999 15:34:17 +0300, Vsevolod Lobko wrote: > > > When using block devices system places many concurent commands for > > device > > Do you find the same poor performance with the now ata driver? I don't check this. I need working atapi support on stable branch :)) (It's an embedded system) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message